You are currently browsing the monthly archive for October, 2008.

Remind me not to order whatever it is Roeser’s having… yowza. Lay off the Kool Aid.

Oberweis? Peraica?

Seriously?

Remind me again why partisan conservatives think the media is “liberal”….

Apparently, uberpartisan conservatives only like to “spread the wealth” (at the point of state trooper’s gun, no less) when a certain governor of Alaska does it:

Welcome to the People’s Republic of Alaska, where every resident this year will get a $3,200 payout, thanks in no small measure to the efforts of Sarah Palin, the state’s Republican governor. That’s $22,400 for a family of seven, like Palin’s. …

Indeed, when the oil companies pay more taxes to the state of Alaska, they get to write that off against their federal tax obligation, leaving the rest of us to make up the shortfall.

Hypocrisy, meet socialist-leaning conservativism.

Oh, and lest we forget (how could Fran Eaton ever let that happen)… Jack! Ryan’s divorce papers were first revealed to the press by the Rod McCulloch, the campaign manager of then-Senate GOP primary candidate Gen. John Borling (ret.). Gen. Borling promptly fired the guy for his shenanigans, but it wasn’t the LA Times or Chicago Tribune that first dug into the story. It was one of Fran Eaton’s fellow conservatives.

It’s been four years since all that came to pass. When will Ms. Eaton get over her Jack!Love? Or is she just bitter because she got stuck working with Alan Keyes after that… a guy with whom even she grew so displeased with that she quit his campaign midstream. And whose demise led to a landslide win for then-Senator elect Barack Obama. The rest, as they say, is history.

Sour! Grapes! Much!?

(The divorce papers themselves had actually been public until Jack! went to court in California much later, in preparation for his Senate run, in order to take the unusual step of asking the judge to have them sealed. And Mr. McCulloch went to work for Illinois conservative illuminatis like Denny Hastert and Peter Roskam but … well, he’s gone from pinstripes and political attacks to a completely different kind of striped suit.)

Georgia George, ya forgot the blood-drippin’ fangs. Also.

(h/t Some guy who likes copyright laws but whose Halloween costume probably won’t include the Un(i/a)bomber… or a 19th C. British poet. Sadly.)

I’m beginning to think conservative partisans may not be able to make it til Election Day. They’re literally starting to beat themselves up in lame-brained attempts to make Obama supporters somehow appear evil and dastardly. From John Moody, executive VP for Fox News, writing on the Fox News blogs yesterday (yes, Fox):

Less than two weeks before we vote for a new president, a white woman says a black man attacked her, then scarred her face, and says there was a political motive for it.

Ashley Todd, a 20-year-old white volunteer for John McCain’s presidential campaign, says she was mugged at an ATM machine in Pittsburgh (my hometown) by a big black man. She further says he threw her down, then disfigured her by carving the letter “B” into her face with a sharp implement when he saw that she supported McCain, not Barack Obama.

Ms. Todd is a McCain campaign volunteer. Photos of her bloodied, black and blue face were all over the news yesterday.

Turns out Ms. Todd made the whole thing up; self-inflicted wounds and all.

Mr. Moody of Fox News concluded his essay with this line:

If the incident turns out to be a hoax, Senator McCain’s quest for the presidency is over, forever linked to race-baiting.

He reports. You decide.

Think about it. All in the same 24 hour span we see conservative partisans cold-heartedly using Sen. Obama’s dying grandmother as just another political tire iron to whack him with; and then GOP VP candidate Sarah Palin claims terrorists who bomb abortion clinics don’t necessarily need to be called “terrorists”; and finally McCain volunteer Ashley Todd put the exclamation point on the bizarre, desperation-induced hysteria that seems to have taken hold of conservative partisans by literally scarring herself for life and leading police on a faked wild goose chase.

All these things are being done because these folks think that somehow they’re helping the McCain candidacy. What was it that Sarah Palin said the other day about “real America”?

This pattern of over-the-top partisan muck-raking, my friends, is about as unreal as you can get.

PS: Could the “B” she carved on her cheek be backwards because she cut herself using a mirror?

She’ll have to live with her own partisan stupidity every time she looks in a mirror. She’s 20 years old. That’s a lot of living, and remembering how stupid this hoax was, left to do.

Sad. Just sad.

Update: ArchPundit reveals Ill Review editor Fran Eaton (mentioned above) bought this hoax hook, line and sinker. Not that she’s never been duped before, especially not one that fits neatly with her loathing for Sen. Obama. Nope. Never.

In her interview with NBC’s Brian Williams, conservative Gov. Sarah Palin claimed that she wouldn’t necessarily use the word “terrorist” to describe nuts who bomb abortion clinics. From a related MSNBC story:

Palin resisted the suggestion that if Ayers was a “domestic terrorist”  — a standard line in her campaign addresses — then so were conservative religious activists who bombed abortion clinics.

“I don’t know if you’re going to use the word ‘terrorist’ there,” she said.

And here’s video of the exchange so you can judge for yourself. Note the “exasperated” sigh she gives after being asked the obvious question:

Yesterday, I wrote that the heart and soul of the conservative movement was cold, hollow and shriveled from lack of use. That was in response to Fran Eaton, one of Illinois’ conservative leaders, callously claiming that Sen. Obama’s visit to his dying grandmother was somehow simply a political stunt. Conservatives commenting on Ms. Eaton’s venom were even worse in their piranha-like partisan feeding frenzy. And this is apparently a nationwide phenomenon among conservative partisans who traded in their consciences for a few chips at a political poker table.

Madelyn Dunham, Sen. Obama’s grandmother, is his only living forebearer and the two are very close. Both his parents are dead and all of his other grandparents have also passed. Yet to desperate conservative partisans this dying grandmother — heroic in her own way — is nothing but a prop to be shat upon and used for their political gain in the final days of their weak, flailing presidential campaign.

So too apparently for Gov. Palin who sees some sort of distinction between bombing a building and bombing a clinic.

To put this in perspective: Would Sarah Palin still consider the 9/11 hijackers to be terrorists if there  had been an abortion clinic in the World Trade Center…?

What the hell is wrong with these conservative partisans that they’ve lost all sense of decency and common humanity?

We’re all in this American community together: you, me, Sarah Palin, Madelyn Dunham, Fran Eaton, Barack Obama, my family, their families, your family, each of our friends and neighbors….

All. Of. Us.

When terrorists bomb an abortion clinic they’re bombing in our communities, in our states, in our nation.

When terrorists fly jets into the Twin Towers and the Pentagon and try to also ram the White House or Congress they’re attacking not just New York or DC but all of us.

When one American’s grandmother is dying we can all respect her and her progeny, feel compassion and empathy for them, and honor her life’s work and deeds.

Those 50 stars and 13 stripes don’t represent one political philosophy over another or one batch of citizens over another.

Our flag… our nation… represents us all.

An attack on one is an attack on all. A death for one is a death for all.

No wonder Americans appear to be rejecting this modern, callous brand of John Birch conservatism in droves, as shown in poll after poll.

is cold, hollow and shriveled from lack of use… if Fran “John Birch” Eaton even has any heart left after so many years of just plain loathing “that one,” Barack Obama, and so many others of her fellow Americans.

I can’t decide which Biblical antagonist best fits Ms. Eaton’s callous disregard for our elders (ie, Sen. Obama’s ailing grandmother): the sniveling elitists who hurried past the injured before the Good Samaritan did what he didn’t have to do or that most infamous of brothers from much earlier on in the Good Book…

Perhaps Ms. Eaton is some bizarre combination of them all, left bitter and desperate by her own blinding partisanship and enmity toward all people and things not precisely in alignment with her own radical brand of Birch-paper conservatism.

Whatever it is, the depth of her acrimony and the ways in which she reveals it are the very definition of pathetic.

Roskam is allegedly abusing his Congressional franking privileges in the weeks leading up to Election Day. He’s a freshman in Congress for goodness sake! That didn’t take long.

This hypocrisy is what our tax money goes toward? And here the conservative partisans were whining last June just because Rep. Bill Foster’s Congressional mailers included (gasp!) information about what Rep. Bill Foster was doing for his constituents. More hypocrites.

Progress Illinois reports on the Public Citizen ethics filing and press release:

“Right up into October, just weeks before the election, voters have been receiving two-page color mailers paid for by taxpayers, with Peter Roskam’s name splashed all over them,” said Joan Claybrook, president of Public Citizen. “Taxpayers should not be footing the bill to advertise Roskam’s candidacy for Congress.”

It is illegal for incumbents in Congress to send out mass mailings less than 90 days before an election. Alternatively, it is also illegal for Congressmen to frank mail that includes certain content (like photos of themselves, etc.) on correspondence that is considered smaller than a “mass mailing”. It appears Cong. Roskam could be violating one or both provisions by trying to thread what he may think is a needle-sized loophole. (Update: See scans here. Pages 7 and on of the filed complaint depict how Cong. Roskam has been digitally printing in custom info within a pre-printed space.)

When will the GOP make it official and just switch the elephant with a hippo?

More details to come if they “arrive in the mail”….

I hereby rescind my previous comments indicating GOP State Rep candidate Christine Prochno is a good person.

I understand the swirl of a race can make some folks rather heady and Ms. Prochno may be a decent human being outside of the campaign world. But, this week’s last-minute mailer (see here; 1.6Mb PDF) from the Illinois GOP spewing acid at Mark Walker over his citations from a dozen years ago goes beyond-the-pale.

As soon as this piece of birdcage liner hit mailboxes yesterday, Mark’s wife cut a robocall tape defending her guy against the scurrilous tripe because it doesn’t just highlight his past transgressions but ties Mark’s mistakes to stats about DUI killings and injuries despite the fact Mark didn’t harm anyone. He has admitted to his bad judgment those many years ago and, having learned from his mistakes, hasn’t had a drink since and has been a vocal advocate for safe, sober driving.

I can see pointing out that these violations are on his record and using it as a point of reference or comparison for a campaign — everyone’s human and three DUIs is serious business. But to drag in the deaths of innocent people when Mark had nothing to do with that takes it straight to the gutter. It’s reprehensible that the GOP would tarnish their memories so.

Note too that this vitriolic mailer is quite hypocritical given the DUIs that members of the Republicans’ own caucus have committed recently … Biggins, Dunn, Mitchell, Ed Sullivan. The worst Ed Sullivan got was a picture of a bicycle on then Dem-candidate Nancy Shepherdson’s website because the judge had ordered his car taken away, and even that piece of clip art didn’t stay online long as it was.

None of those facts, apparently, gave the Illinois Republican Party pause. Obviously, IL-GOP still hasn’t figured out that such acrid character assassination attacks are turning out to be a big-time self-inflicted negative this election year (just ask John “pals around with terrorists” McCain and reference his tanking favorability ratings). Of course, the GOP is making a habit of cherry-picking a fact, adding a barely related half-truth, and turning it all into an outright lie — which Ms. Prochno calls “simply politics as usual”. No wonder so many people, already tired of “politics as usual” anyway, are growing more and more disgusted at the elephant party’s legion of smears from the Federal to the local levels.

The Daily Herald called out Mark for the harsh tone of the Dems’ campaign against Chris a few weeks back. Since then his campaign actually did dial it down a bit even as he continues to stake out strong positions contrasting his principles to hers. Now, however, the Herald is slamming Chris Prochno for the newly angry tone of her party’s attacks (and this commentary was published last weekend before the latest attack was lobbed):

Turnabout’s unfair play

A few weeks ago, we slapped Mark Walker’s hand for unseemly direct mail attacks against Christine Prochno of Elk Grove Village in their battle for State Rep. Carolyn Krause’s seat. Walker, an Arlington Heights Democrat, has toned down some since then. But the Republican Party’s gone completely off the wall on behalf of Prochno with an ugly series of unfair and dishonest direct mail attacks against Walker. Christine, please elevate your campaign. (emphasis added)

And, as if the needlessly over-the-top mailer itself weren’t bad enough, it included Mark’s driver’s license number and home address for thousands of neighbors to see thanks to the GOP’s carefully designed layout (I blocked it in my scan). …Just in case any identity thieves in the Republicans’ large mailing universe got bored this week.

Mark has atoned for his sins and tried making amends over the past 12 years as best he can. The GOP’s partisan response to that effort is pathetic and, like McCain’s flailing attempts to sling sewage, may quickly backfire.

Full disclosure: I’ve known Mark Walker for years. He volunteered for the military to serve in Vietnam, has had a successful business career since then and is also quite active in civic affairs to improve our community as a volunteer.

I’m proud to be supporting Mark’s candidacy for State Rep by going door to door for him and talking to folks about what a great person and solid leader he is.

I’ve also met Chris Prochno and, up until this week, respected her even as she campaigned against my friend….

Sen. Dan Kotowski has earned the nickname “The Tiger” down in Springfield for his tenacious hard work. The Daily Herald recognizes that effort and endorsed Kotowski today (not yet online):

Voters have distinct choices in Sen. Dan Kotowski of Park Ridge and Republican Mike Sweeney of Arlington Heights. Where Kotowski favored gambling expansion in what ended up a failed budget resolution, for example, Sweeney opposes more gambling to prop up “out of control” spending. Sweeney is right about Springfield, of course, in sentiments echoed by voters across the suburbs. But the Daily Herald does not see Kotowski as the problem. Instead, Dan Kotowski has shown independence and resilience at a time when most lawmakers have been relegated to do-nothing status by the powers that be. He should be sent back to continue his work. (emphasis added)

PS… The problems alluded to in this blurb are real. To wit: The major problem in Springfield is Gov. Blagojevich whom Kotowski very publicly declared he would not vote for in 2006 (even as he himself ran for the Senate seat). And, regarding the Stroger tax in Cook County, Kotowski has prepared legislation that would require voter approval for any such tax increases.

For background on Sweeney’s hypocritical, flailing campaign against Kotowski… see my take here or ArchPundit’s comments here and here.

Full disclosure: I know Dan and am actively volunteering for him. I look forward to voting for him so he can continue to represent me, my family and our principles in our state’s Capitol.

Apparently the Mike Sweeney campaign isn’t too worried about looking hypocritical…. The 29-year-old has been attacking Senator Dan Kotowski (33rd district) all year over the issues of pay raises and taxes. Today the Senate Republicans dumped a bunch of money into Sweeney’s moribund campaign account in order to attack the workhorse Kotowski with a wacky ad.

Sweeney and the Republicans want to talk salary? Fine. The facts are simple:

Kotowski –

- Sen. Kotowski actually co-sponsored (with Sen. Susan Garrett) this year’s action to block legislative pay raises, ticking off Emil Jones in the process. There was some question over the summer of whether or not Jones would it let go through but he did and the vote was 47-nil to stop the raises. (HLR 0132)

- Kotowski gave some of his salary away in the form of a scholarship. Maybe Mike Sweeney should ask Maine South grad Maggie Wave about it sometime. (The Pioneer Press and Daily Herald reported on this last spring so it’s not like Sweeney couldn’t have easily found out about it… if he actually cared about his would-be constituents that is.)

- Kotowski also refused the stipend that was given to legislators last year because of the governor’s idiocy with his past-the-deadline budget goofiness. By the by, Kotowski famously didn’t vote for Blagojevich’s reelection in 06.

Sweeney -

- Mike Sweeney works full time as a manager for a local Walgreens store. He likely makes a decent annual salary in that position; nothing wrong with that.

- But, on top of his regular, work-a-day salary from Walgreens Mike Sweeney also rakes in another $22,000+ from the taxpayers of Elk Grove Township because he is their appointed, part-time Township Clerk.

22k from the taxpayers as a part-time guy who works another job full-time anyway? And he’s attacking the incumbent on salary increases (increases that the guy worked to actually block)…?

Get a new talking point.

- But wait, there’s more. Sweeney hasn’t just been yelping about lege salaries. He’s also been griping about raises.

Yet sure enough his own $22,000 taxpayer-funded salary is actually … you guessed it … a raise over last year, and the year before, and the year before. Yes, fair readers, Sweeney’s been taking in taxpayer funded payraises every single year he’s been a Clerk including this year while he’s been complaining out of the other side of his mouth about payraises in Springfield (even though those raises actually got killed thanks to Kotowski and Garrett).

- Another little aside on Elk Grove Township and use of tax funds… The Republican-led Township trustees have also seen fit to mail out their township newsletter to a bunch of folks on the south end of Wheeling Township (which neighbors Elk Grove) for well over a year. Amazingly, these Wheeling Twp denizens also happen to live in the 33rd district. All that extra printing and postage for people who don’t even live in that township is just a coincidence, I’m sure.

…Speaking of taxes, Sen. Kotowski has sponsored legislation to strike back at Todd Stroger’s stupid sales tax. Since he’s so anti-tax (even though his fellow party members on the Elk Grove Township board seem very ready to literally throw tax money out the window) Mike Sweeney might want to look it up and learn something about the job he’s seeking.

It’s all well and good that both Kotowski and Sweeney actually agree (in word, if not in deed) on these issues. But Kotowski has the record of actually doing something more than just talking about salaries and taxes, as opposed to Sweeney who has happily double-dipped on both his full-time salary and the gravy train of his taxpayer-funded salary and annual raises for part-time work.

Here’s a Kotowski campaign press release from last Thursday. A bit more pertinent today:

Dan Kotowski for Senate | October 9, 2008

Republican campaigns against pay raises, can’t run from the fact that he accepted three pay raises as Elk Grove Township Clerk

Republican Mike Sweeney has run on a campaign pledge to refuse legislative pay raises, but as Elk Grove Township Clerk he collected three taxpayer-funded pay raises over the last three years.

The three percent pay raises applied to all elected township officials for the years 2005-2006, 2006-2007 and 2007-2008, resulting in a nine percent pay raise for Sweeney over the same period.

According to Resolution No. 2004-11, which was approved in 2005 by the Elk Grove Township Board of Trustees, the pay raises were scheduled to kick in each May. In press releases and newsletters to voters, Sweeney has accused state legislators of lining their pockets at the expense of taxpayers.

State Sen. Dan Kotowski has a record of opposing pay increases in the Illinois Senate. He went against his party leadership and led the fight to blockthe legislative pay raise proposed by the Compensation Review Board. In fact, Kotowski was achief sponsor of the resolution, which passed in September and stopped the pay increase from going into effect.

Kotowski also returned to the Illinois Treasury the stipends provided to him during legislative overtime sessions last year. He also contributed $3,000 from his salary to a local educational scholarship.

Kotowski said his opponent’s statements are another example of the misleading, negative campaign that he has run this far.

“My opponent has tried to mislead the voters about my record. He has presented few solutions and presented as his single biggest issue a promise not to accept a legislative pay raise, but he’s already accepted three as township clerk. How can the public trust him to keep this campaign promise if he is says one thing and does another?” Kotowski said.

And here is Mike Sweeney’s two-faced attack:

Full Disclosure: Regular readers know I’m a Kotowski supporter. New readers may not. I’ve been supporting Dan Kotowski since his first run in 2006 and am volunteering and endorsing him again this year. He’s accomplished more in his first two years in office (15 bills passed and signed into law improving everything from safety to healthcare to veterans’ issues) than many of Springfield’s politicians do in their entire career.

Dan Kotowski has earned my trust and support and I’m happy to help him when and where I can.

UPDATE: ArchPundit is more concise than I in taking the Republicans to task for their mud-slinging hypocrisy.

…Larry obviously did not inherit the talkiness gene from his mom, unlike me. ;)

NESSY HEADLINE: GOPUSA ILLINOIS Editor Dave Diersen makes it clear that he has no problem with GOP candidates John McCain and Mark Kirk or the Republican National Committee accepting thousands upon thousands of dollars from anti-American hypocrites who pal around with unrepentant domestic terrorist Ayers or McCain’s and Kirk’s and the GOP’s relationships to those well-heeled terrorist sympathizers.

http://capitalfax.blogspot.com/2008/10/gopusa-illinois-daily-clips-october-10.html

(…Ain’t Conserv-O-Logic™ fun? Milton-Bradley ought to get rights on making this a word game. The holidays are coming up.)

Sadly (and in all seriousness), GOPUSA ILLINOIS Editor Dave Diersen also makes it clear he has no problem with a highly partisan activist taking taxpayer money to freelance as a supposedly non-partisan Election Commission spokesman.

PS: Everyone already know Diersen was full of it, but apparently he’s also completely heartless … playing the Levite during his neighbors’ hour of need. From that same GOPUSA ILLINOIS newsletter:

SUBURBAN LIFE
– DIERSEN HEADLINE: VERY SAD: Democrats get 45,000 people who lack job skills and/or lack job experience and/or who have severe health, financial, and/or other problems to come to DuPage County to “live in poverty” and 121,000 to live “one paycheck away from being homeless.”
http://www.mysuburbanlife.com/glenellyn/homepage/x1452590143/-Sleep-Out-Saturday-raises-awareness-of-homelessness

Very sad indeed, not too mention un-Christian and just plain cold. Clearly, he has no interest in being his neighbors’ keeper when they’re down on their luck. If only all of those whom he walks over could be as privileged as him to live on a pile of poop, his sheer lack of compassion might then go unnoticed.

UPDATE: Your GOPUSA ILLINOIS Editor does a bit of creative editing but by and large actually reported at least one report fairly accurately at the very tail end of this morning’s GOPUSA ILLINOIS newsletter. Good on ya, mate.

Fun with numbers. I’m not sure how accurate that is, but if it’s true… wow.

Dan Curry, the taxpayer-funded spokesman for the supposedly “bipartisan” (or is it “nonpartisan”?) DuPage County Election Commission, is whining about the Tribune again. His complaints seem to center on the fact that, like the New York Times and every other legitimate news organization in existence, the Trib has looked into the “connection” between Bill Ayers and Barack Obama and found there to be, quite frankly, no there there.

The entire conservative partisan act of crocodile tears over their six-degrees-of-dogpiles is rather convoluted in the first place. Essentially, Curry and others are moaning that Obama knows Ayers and worked with him on a charity’s board of directors, among other things. Ayers — as Obama has repeatedly acknowledged — committed some horrible, despicable crimes … when Obama was 8.

Knowing they can’t claim that Obama is somehow at fault for those crimes (without being laughed out of the ballot box, that is), conservative partisans like Dan “spokesman for the DuPage County Election Commission” Curry instead gripe that he sat down in the same room with Ayers.

That too is a laughable whine seeing as how the charity in question was funded by a very conservative Republican fellow and the board of directors itself included a variety of people with all sorts of political leanings.

Why, ArchPundit found just yesterday that a $1000 McCain donor sat on that very same board with both Ayers and Obama. That guy also gave to other Republicans and the GOP itself. In fact, there was yet another Republican big-money donor on that board; a fellow who donated quite a lot to local conservative Congressman Mark Kirk (and, again, the Republican Party).

I won’t hold my breath while waiting for Curry to disingenuously exclaim that the Trib needs to also look into why McCain and Kirk accept money from GOP donors who “pal around with terrorists” to use Sarah Palin’s vitriol…

(And, one more time, why is an uber-partisan like Dan Curry being paid with taxpayer money to act as spokesman for the DuPage County Election Commission?)

UPDATE: GOPUSA ILLINOIS Editor Dave Diersen defends the indefensible when it comes to his pal Dan Curry, again.

If the Senator formerly known as a straight talker and his ‘aw shucks’ sidekick are going to focus on half-baked, barely credible “links” to bad characters and play six-degrees-of-baloney, Camp Obama is going to beat back those low blows with a few right and left hooks by discussing McCain’s actual, long-term, and close relationships to nefarious ne’er-do-wells and demonstrate how those unethical friendships harm our nation with the bright light of truth and honesty such as that in the recently launched KeatingEconomics.com.

My fellow Americans, as this documentary at KeatingEconomics.com shows we have been through a banking crisis in this country before, all too recently. And it was Sen. McCain’s zeal for deregulation and “poor judgment” when it came to his good pal Charles Keating that was at the heart of that $2.6 Billion+ “mistake”.

McCain was not just One of the Keating Five. He was a vacation buddy, a Senate “in”, and a defensive attack dog when it came to his “good friend” Mr. Keating.

Strangely, in today’s easily debunked lies trying to toss that good McCain-Keating friendship under the Not-So-Straight Talk bus, McCain has been laughably claiming that he was open about it at the time [link] and that the investigation itself was some sort of smear job

John Aravosis did a little digging over the weekend to learn the truth about McCain’s reaction to the then-brand new Keating 5 Scandal:

When the story broke, McCain did nothing to help himself. “You’re a liar,” McCain said when a[n Arizona] Republic reporter asked him about the business relationship between his wife and Keating. “That’s the spouse’s involvement, you idiot,” McCain said later in the same conversation. “You do understand English, don’t you?” He also belittled reporters when they asked about his wife’s ties to Keating. “It’s up to you to find that out, kids.” The paper ran the story.

Aravosis also points out that McCain was committing his self-admitted “poor judgment” over his good friend’s bamboozlement costing billions while in his 50s, not 8 years old like Obama was when current conservative strawman Bill Ayers was committing his despicable crimes. That, and McCain used to actually admit to his mistakes and “poor judgment”, saying in his own book (Worth Fighting For):

I made the worst mistake of my life by attending two meetings, the first with the chairman of the Federal Home Loan Bank Board, the government agency charged with regulating the practices of the nation’s savings and loans, and a week later with four bank examiners based in San Francisco who were at that time investigating the investment and lending practices of Lincoln Savings and Loan of Irvine, California, owned by my good friend and generous supporter Charles Keating.

Clearly, now that they’ve backed themselves into a corner by smearing the room with their own fetid bunk and have nowhere to go but even further down, the frenetic McCain campaign’s dragon-breath all-attacks, all-the-time strategy is forcing the calm, cool and collected (and steel-spined) Obama camp to fight fire with fire. Politico concludes:

The Obama campaign, including its surrogates appearing on radio and television, will argue that the deregulatory fervor that caused massive, cascading savings-and-loan collapses in the late ‘80s was pursued by McCain throughout his career, and helped cause the current credit crisis.

Obama-Biden communications director Dan Pfeiffer said: “While John McCain may want to turn the page on his erratic response to the current economic crisis, we think voters will find his involvement in a similar crisis to be particularly interesting. His involvement with Keating is a window into McCain’s economic past, present, and future.”

That’s not a difficult argument to make, seeing as how McCain’s most (in)visible economic advisor is former Sen. Phil Gramm. While he’s most famous for recently hypocritically crying that America is a “nation of whiners,” Mr. Gramm co-authored the very legislation which led to the mortgage and banking deregulation and line-blurring that precipitated our current mess.

The Obama-Biden campaign will be pushing back on John “Mr. Negative” McCain’s recent decision to go all-smear, all-the-time by pointing out Sen. McCain’s “poor judgment” in palling around with deregulated Savings and Loan frauds…

Says camp Obama-Biden:

Obama-Biden communications director Dan Pfeiffer said: “While John McCain may want to turn the page on his erratic response to the current economic crisis, we think voters will find his involvement in a similar crisis to be particularly interesting. His involvement with Keating is a window into McCain’s economic past, present, and future.” (emphasis added)

At noon, Monday, October 6th, the best-managed campaign in America will release a full 13-minute documentary on McCain’s association with Charles Keating — likely to include such nefarious hits as McCain’s vacations with the Keatings and his influence-peddling on behalf of Mr. Keating’s costly, deregulated failures.

If McCain really wants to repeat Sen. Hillary Clinton’s mistakes of bringing up a guy who did some despicable acts when Sen. Obama was 8… then let’s talk about some real guilt-by-association and Sen. McCain’s “poor judgment” related to same.

Update: The Trailer to the McCain-Keating “poor judgment” documentary is up and running…

Head to KeatingEconomics.com after noon Eastern time for the full expose. Research and recent (yes, recent) news articles about McCain’s cozy relationship with Charles Keating and the Keating 5 scandal is already available at KeatingEconomics.com.

a