Daily Herald reporter John Patterson writes that he just received a robocall targeting Melissa Bean, but it was with a 217 area code number.
Nevermind that the call apparently tried to mislead citizens by tsk-tsking the Congressional recess before a vote on military pay (implying our soldiers would somehow have to go unpaid in the interim — wholly untrue, the vote is for future pay).
Mr. Patterson’s surprise wasn’t over the implied fallacy, it was over the 217 area code since it covers central Illinois and doesn’t even come close to Melissa Bean’s 8th district…
Oddly enough, Melissa Bean is sponsoring legislation that would require full disclosure listing exactly who is calling on Caller ID. If it were law, Mr. Patterson would know [who] that someone that called him is.
In light of that sponsorship conservative partisans, who typically claim they favor responsibility and honesty, have been railing against her ever since … replete with slimey over-the-top essays comparing this soccer mom Member of Congress to a brutal dictator in their feigned rage. (And with crackers like that poisoning the well it’s little wonder the American people by and large are rejecting such venomous rhetoric.)
(Disclosure: I’ve done some work for past Bean campaigns. Who knows if I will again this cycle. She’s a great person and seems to be coming into her own as a legislator.)

8 comments
Comments feed for this article
May 28, 2008 at 9:01 am
Drudging Up Drama - A Chicago Blog
[...] Illinois Reason is up in arms over a robocall into Melissa Bean’s district coming from area code 217, which is Springfield and central Illinois. While there could be something nefarious at work here, it’s more likely just the marketplace. Campaigns are a businesses just like any other. No one in their right mind would turn down a Springfield firm charging half a penny per call for a 8th-district firm charging a full penny (Disclaimer: I am just guessing at these numbers). There should be limits to our provincialism don’t you think? Tags: 8th District, Election 2008, Melissa Bean You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site. [...]
May 28, 2008 at 9:33 am
robnesvacil
(Cross-posted from Mike’s A Chicago Blog… )
Did you read the Illinois Reason post? “Up in arms”?
I think you need to clean your glasses Mike.
All I wrote was that the Daily Herald’s John Patterson got a call targeting Cong. Bean and that if Melissa Bean’s robocall legislation was a law instead of a bill, Mr. Patterson would know who was ringing.
I also noted the fallacy inherent in the call itself as well as the recent fits of feigned rage from Bean’s con opponents over her robocall proposal. Both are points Mr. Patterson ignored in his brief post.
PS - As I understand it, the phone call actually went to Mr. Patterson’s bureau office in Springfield (not “into Melissa Bean’s district” as you’ve written). Hence his surprise, and my post regarding his surprise, since her 8th district is nowhere near Springfield — http://blogs.dailyherald.com/node/114
May 28, 2008 at 10:44 am
Chris
Let me get this straight. A robocall went to Sfield about Cong. Bean?
May 28, 2008 at 10:55 am
robnesvacil
Yes … according to John Patterson, the Daily Herald’s Springfield bureau reporter.
May 28, 2008 at 1:15 pm
Shaun Dakin
Hi,
This robo is probably from Freedom’s Watch. There was chatter last Friday about this in the Politico. See my blog for the story.
blog.StopPoliticalCalls.org
Shaun Dakin
CEO and Founder
The National Political Do Not Contact Registry
StopPoliticalCalls.org
May 28, 2008 at 1:25 pm
robnesvacil
If it was from Freedom’s Watch (described as a right-wing “front group” and “slush fund”) then they just wasted a bunch of money — whether at half-a-penny or a whole penny per call…
Maybe Mr. Patterson will take a break of the Springfield molasses and write about it for the print version of the Herald.
July 12, 2008 at 10:05 am
Drudging Up Drama
[...] Illinois Reason is up in arms over a robocall into Melissa Bean’s district coming from area code 217, which is Springfield and central Illinois. While there could be something nefarious at work here, it’s more likely just the marketplace. Campaigns are a businesses just like any other. No one in their right mind would turn down a Springfield firm charging half a penny per call for a 8th-district firm charging a full penny (Disclaimer: I am just guessing at these numbers). There should be limits to our provincialism don’t you think? [...]
July 13, 2008 at 10:57 pm
robnesvacil
Mike (”Drudging Up Drama”) appears to be testing out a new blog format of some sort…
I responded to his original post, correcting his error (which he duly noted), back when it first appeared.