Dave Smith of strident gay-hatin’ fame has a post over at Illinois Review whining about tax dollars that are given to Planned Parenthood for women’s health services… In his frothy zest to get his screed against women online, he spins himself into a pretzel:
While Planned Parenthood claims that these funds are not used for abortion, obviously having this constant supply of tax dollars coming in as part of your budget makes all other areas of operation much easier to sustain.
Yes, obviously having this “constant supply of tax dollars” coming to provide the women’s health services for which those tax dollars are being granted would make one’s operation easier to sustain… That’s the point, Mr. “anti-family” Smith.
Not every woman can afford health care for herself — thus as the compassionate society we are we “care for our neighbors as we do ourselves.”
Does Mr. Smith complain about other doctors that receive grants in order to perform routine medical care?
(Yes, some — not all — Planned Parenthood clinics provide abortion services. Such medical procedures, as Planned Parenthood has stated, are funded through a combination of donations and direct fees to medical patients. But as most rational folks know, Planned Parenthood provides many more medical services than just the one Mr. Smith finds offensive including counseling, regular exams, disease treatment and prevention, etc.)
And how about those trillions of Mr. Smith’s tax dollars being spent on “collateral damage” for our president’s lies? Is Mr. Smith just as forcefully seeking to cut off that spigot of money and bring our intrepid, loyal troops home? Or does Mr. Smith somehow excuse and apologize for all that?

4 comments
Comments feed for this article
April 15, 2008 at 6:47 pm
Alex
Yes or no…
Do you support taxpayer funded abortions?
…and I’m not sure why you brought up the war in Iraq.
April 15, 2008 at 10:02 pm
Chris
Smith’s complaints are very similar to my complaint about tax dollars going towards abstinence only education. Or my complaint about tax dollars going towards “faith based programs.” The difference being for Planned Parenthood’s sake the money allocated by the government is given under strict guidelines as what the money can be spent on, such as health care for women. Smith contributes that as freeing up funds for Planned Parenthood to use for abortions. In my case, tax payer financing of “faith based programs” frees up money for churches and school programs as well. The faith based initiatives and abstinence only education programs are not as strictly guidelined as Planned Parenthood.
The way I see it, abstinence only education eventually leads to a visit to Planned Parenthood. If we shouldn’t fund Planned Parenthood, then we shouldn’t fund abstinence only programs either.
April 16, 2008 at 8:44 am
robnesvacil
Alex,
What “taxpayer funded abortions”? It’s a moot point.
As for Iraq, see Chris’ reply. Our tax dollars are killing people in Iraq (some purposefully so, many “accidentally” so). Do you approve of this yourself?
–
Chris,
Precisely, although there’s a difference between “funding Planned Parenthood” (ie, funding all of PP) or simply funding (even partial funding, as it is now) of certain, specific Planned Parenthood programs with regards to women’s health issues.
April 16, 2008 at 3:14 pm
Chris
Very true!