Anne Leary and other conservative partisans have apparently taken to calling the lying Rudy “likes black pantyhose” Giuliani some sort of ‘liberal slayer’. Never mind the point on why they feel a need to “slay” their fellow Americans in the first place… but he’s not even very good at doing what their bizarre fawning says he is.
Mr. Giuliani is the former NYC mayor whose direct contradiction of his first responders’ advice (for reasons of pure political showmanship) led to the 9/11 destruction of the Big Apple’s emergency response hq has been chastised by those very first responders and also by his former mayoral emergency management director.
And now, after his goofy full-page ad blaming a Senator for a different ad that wasn’t from the Senator but was from a completely different organization, MoveOn.org (a group of Americans with the courage to tell it like it is)… well, that group of Americans is pointing out the truth behind his hypocrisy and his silliness.
Watch it here. “Liberal slayer” my knee. What a silly thing to claim when the candidate is so obviously weak.
Curiously, Ms. Leary chose to cherry-pick a quote from that Giuliani interview by the conservative pundit Sean Hannity:
Who should America listen to…A decorated soldier’s commitment to defending America, or Hillary Clinton’s commitment to defending MoveOn.org?
Since we already know what the First Amendment (never mind Sen. Clinton) has to say about defending Americans’ right to free speech, let’s listen to what that decorated ass-kissing chickenshit soldier has to say about his commitment to defending America:
Republican Sen. John Warner: “Does that [continuing the Iraqi war] make America safer?”
Gen. David Petraeus: “Sir, I – I don’t know, actually.” (emphasis added)
Clearly, Rudy Giuliani, Anne Leary and the other conservative partisans mindlessly chirping their talking points don’t know either.
(h/t Kos)

8 comments
Comments feed for this article
September 17, 2007 at 5:25 pm
dwlawson
Yep, a Clinton v. Guiliani presidental election will have me wishing I could vote for “None of the Above”.
Hard to say which one of those two scares me the most.
September 17, 2007 at 5:30 pm
robnesvacil
At least you know where Clinton stands most of the time.
With Giuliani you need a Star Trek translator to figure out what he really means cuz his oddball statements are so out there. His only redeeming speaking value is that you know he thinks something is really, really, really important because his eyeballs start popping out. Watch him speak sometime, you’ll see what I mean.
September 18, 2007 at 8:20 am
c-rockforfreedom
I just say no to neo-cons like Rudy.
If its Rudy and Clinton, I am voting for more evil this time. Chulilu is my man then.
September 18, 2007 at 2:39 pm
dwlawson
C-Rock, did you mean Cthulhu? If so, I’m all over that ticket. Doesn’t need a running mate.
In my opinion, Hillary is a socialist dictator in waiting. Rudy is an accomplished dictator. Like Romney, I feel Guiliani only cares about power and he’ll hold whatever position gets him there.
September 18, 2007 at 3:31 pm
c-rockforfreedom
Ya,
Cthulhu is the guy I am voting for. More Evil dammit!!
September 18, 2007 at 4:22 pm
robnesvacil
Maybe all your laments about zombies will become a self-fulfilling wish, C-Rock.
September 18, 2007 at 10:53 pm
c-rockforfreedom
What will do you Rob when Hell has no more room?
September 18, 2007 at 11:24 pm
robnesvacil
Have sympathy and compassion for you.