Jill “breathless about sexuality” Stanek is all hot and bothered because anti-abortion protesters outside the planned Gemini Office Development medical complex in Aurora (a tenant of which is scheduled to be Planned Parenthood) were told by police that they had to keep their signs and other political material in motion, in order to follow local sign ordinances.
Maybe the folks at the staunchly partisan Thomas More Law Center who are now engaged in helping the anti-privacy extremists wend their way through court could combine forces with the DuPage Duo who were arrested (arrested!) in DuPage County for holding up signs protesting the White House.
Maybe…

5 comments
Comments feed for this article
August 29, 2007 at 10:18 am
c-rockforfreedom
Well,
what do you expect with big government, and big laws? I always thought signage laws were too much.
August 29, 2007 at 11:01 am
robnesvacil
I’ll remind you of that when McDonald’s puts a billboard in your parkway without your consent, blocking your view out your front window. Parkways are village property after all, and the village could do what it wants in your lawless utopia — gotta pay for those roads and sewers somehow since you’re also so against paying your fair share through taxes.
August 30, 2007 at 8:26 am
c-rockforfreedom
Parkways are theres,
then why the hell I have to pay money to cut the grass in front of my house on the parkway?
If its their property, they have a right to put up a sign. How much, and how big is the question.
But the problem is, then you have blowback on politican signage. Does that sound American to you Rob?
August 30, 2007 at 8:28 am
c-rockforfreedom
Who said anything about lawless? There are common sense laws out there. Which most are- Dont steal, or attack someone, or their property.
Thats the majority of laws that are needed.
August 30, 2007 at 8:41 am
robnesvacil
So now you do want to restrict the number and size of signs? Make up your mind.
As for “lawless”, yes there are common sense laws in our country. You clearly disagree with many of them (and ardently so).