Looks like somebody took some good notes in How To Manipulate Statistics 101.
Greg Blankensh links and quotes from a Lawrence Kudlow column in today’s Washington Times (for those unfamiliar, the Washington Times is a conservative propaganda piece, akin to a print version of Fox). Curiously, Mr. Kudlow’s headline was “War Against Prosperity”… Mr. Blankensh embellished it to “The Democrat War Against Prosperity”.Nicely wordage, Mr. Blankensh. In all fairness, maybe the “i” and “c” keys got stuck on his keyboard, just like the “i” and “p” in Blankensh.
Right off the bat, you know the column is a doozy of a spin job what with Mr. Kudlow’s equating of the Democratic presidential contenders’ calls for tax investments to “attacks” and “assaults” (not to mention that whole “war” analogy launched with the headline)… Of course, the proposed taxes Mr. Kudlow rails against are for levels most Americans actually don’t see — certainly I’m not there, and Mr. Blankensh is likely not at that level either. And business taxes are business taxes — we’re all in this together, individuals and businesses alike, though Mr. Kudlow seems blind to that fact.
But far be it from Dems (and a few Repubs, as Mr. Kudlow notes) to hope for fairness in our tax structure so that those who enjoy the most benefit from the American system also contribute back most of the costs of paying for that system.
Listen, no one enjoys paying taxes but my relatively low tax charge helps keep my nation’s Army armed … and prevents planes from crashing over my house … and keeps highways up and running so I can visit my family … and on and on. Others enjoy even more benefits from America’s governmental system, as those wealthy upper classes and the like enjoy the fruits of our courts as the Equal sweeteners of the country sue the pants off the Splenda sweeteners, our Commerce Dept. promotes their businesses worldwide, and on and on.
But wait, those taxes aren’t investments that keep our nation’s engine oiled and running… Nope. According to the Bizzaro World of Kudlow and Blankensh they are assaults, indeed, taken together they are a war against keeping that very engine oiled and running even though without them we as a nation are forced to turn to Communist China and the oil princes of Saudi Arabia.
Ah yes, don’t we all miss those days in the 90s when jobs were too easy to come by, salaries didn’t stagnate and the Clinton economy was humming along just too well. Where’s the fun and challenge in an economy that works for all Americans, instead of the rich-getting-richer Americans we have now under President Take-Two-Tax-Cuts-and-Call-Me-in-’09?
Everyone knows you shouldn’t spend money you don’t have … well, everyone except Mr. Blankensh’s Republica allies. Call it the Republica War on Common Sense. Instead of bringing in revenues at reasonable Clinton levels, the elephants cut revenues and then went on a spending spree. Sen. John McCain said the Republicas were spending like drunken sailors. The pachyderms even had to raise the debt ceiling a few times under their watch in order to accumulate more debt from Red China and the Saudis.
But wait, Mr. Kudlow remembers his notes from How To Manipulate Stats 101. He chides Sen. Hillary Clinton by saying “business tax collections as a share of overall tax revenues have skyrocketed — well above levels witnessed during the Clinton 1990s.” Duh. That’s because Pres. Bush and the Republica Congresses cut income taxes … so other taxes are naturally going to have a larger share of the overall pie. That’s no fuzzy math.
At the heart of Mr. Kudlow’s slam against everyone contributing their fair share is another ridiculous argument in favor of the conservatives’ pipe dream of a flat tax. Essentially, it’s another huge windfall payout to the wealthy at the expense of everyone else — the wealthy gain as the see their tax bills cut by a third or more and everyone else is forced to make up the difference. Rich Little put it best during the Bush 43 Inauguration when he told the assembled GOP bigwigs that the Class War was over, and the wealthy won. But, Mr. Kudlow is still fighting those old battles against the middle- and lower-classes with his promotion of the flat tax. I’m surprised he didn’t bring up the idea of a national gross receipts tax, I mean, sales tax (aka, the conservatives’ Unfair Tax).
You want to see Mr. Kudlow’s ideas in action? Just talk to anyone who’s tried to get a passport at some point in the last year. Pres. Bush’s Dept. of Homeland Security put out an unfunded mandate requiring passports for travel between the US and Canada, Mexico and Caribbean nations. The State Dept’s passport processing center still hasn’t recovered — and there’s no money to devote to raising staffing levels to those necessitated by the unfunded mandate. You want to see more of the results of Mr. Kudlow’s taxes-are-bad myopia? One word: Katrina. Why was it that hurricane response under Clinton actually worked as well as could be expected, but under Bush it failed miserably?
One more point that completely obliterates Mr. Kudlow’s harping about taxes being a “war against prosperity”.
The stock market does significantly better (and is less volatile) under Democratic presidents than under Republica presidents. You can look it up. It could be because Democrats actually give two shakes about seeing that everyone does well, not just the “base” as Mr. Bush has called wealthy elitists, and when everyone fares better the entire economy rises right along with them.
But do you think Misters Kudlow and Blankensh can ever bring themselves to recognize common sense? …Don’t hold your breath.

8 comments
Comments feed for this article
June 20, 2007 at 7:41 am
c-rockjr121
Roads are built from gas taxes, not income taxes. Income taxes are nothing more than slavery to the state.
In the 90s, we had the Internet bubble, and while that happened, the jobs started going to China.
Plus low interest rates help cause the housing bubble.
For myself, I would like to see the income tax ablolished. On the armed forces, I rather see Americans well armed, and a small coastal/border force. We do not need to be the worlds policeman. Plus they also give taxpayers money to foreign counties, like Israel, Somalia, etc. Which causes blowback.
You might be happy with your chains, but others are not. So why do you complain if they free you from their actions?
June 20, 2007 at 9:10 am
robnesvacil
No General Funds go to pay for roads? That’s news to everyone else C-Rock. And jobs were going to China and other slave-wages countries well before the 90s.
Your interest in a well-armed citizenship, while an interesting solution to your proposed dramatic reduction in Armed Forces, doesn’t take into account human nature and is rather utopian in its view. Are we supposed to arm 8-year-olds so they don’t get taken by well-armed pedophiles at gun point on their way to school?
And when your income tax is abolished, how do we pay for things like…
- the interstate highways (are they all toll roads?)
- the FAA (a huge surcharge on each plane ticket? that would likely put even more airlines out of business… then again, you don’t pay income taxes when you’re unemployed either, right?)
- the CDC (oh wait, I suppose you think we shouldn’t bother trying to prevent the spread of deadly infections and should instead just hope we’re “lucky”)
- the Judicial System (here you may have a point. Maybe if every business had to simply pay a straight-up court cost fee in order to sue another business the conservatives would truly be able to get rid of “frivolous” lawsuits since most court time is sucked up by business interests)
- etc.
June 20, 2007 at 10:22 am
c-rockjr121
Majority of fees for roads come from gas taxes, city stickers, plates, plate stickers,etc. Heck, you pay a sales tax on the car when you buy it too. So you could make the roads more into a user based system.
The FAA is not needed. Airlines and airports could come up with a system that works better for all.
How are pedophiles going to be armed, if they are felons already? Also registered too?
June 20, 2007 at 10:58 am
robnesvacil
You complain about being having to register for a gun, etc….. Now you’re changing your mind?
June 20, 2007 at 12:45 pm
c-rockjr121
No,
I thought sex offenders in this state are already registered when they are convicted in a court of law.
for gunowners, your registered in this state for just wanting to buy a gun or ammo.
June 20, 2007 at 4:18 pm
robnesvacil
Sex offenders would be registered. You have complained about gun owners having to register. Others who advocate a free flow of guns have complained about background checks.
If our state and nation completely stripped away all firearms supervision, sex offenders would be able to buy guns …. whether they are registered as sex offenders or not (if they’ve never been caught, they wouldn’t be registered as it is).
You can’t have it both ways, C-Rock, claiming you want to forbid certain types of people from having guns but out of the other side of your mouth proclaiming that there should be no oversight of firearms whatsoever.
Or do you agree with me that reasonable supervision of arms is just good common sense?
June 20, 2007 at 4:20 pm
robnesvacil
And again, your fetish for shiney, hard, metallic objects has led you to hijack a thread that originally had nothing to do with guns.
June 21, 2007 at 7:19 am
c-rockjr121
Hold on there buddy. I just brought up points. The only one doing any hijacking, is your Sen. Dan the ban.
On your question. I do not know the answer. What we have now, is too much. If your a felon of a violent crime, you should be disarmed. You should go to jail if your caught with a gun.
Someone in for tax fraud, I dont agree with that. They shouldnt lose their right to self defense.